According to
an article in the
Boston Globe's North section this week, a subcommittee of the
Georgetown School Committee violated the
Massachusetts Open Meeting Law. As David Bjork, School Committee Clerk, states
in the article, "Apparently, we did inadvertently violate the Open Meeting Law. ...As far back as anyone can remember, it has not been the practice of any of our subcommittees to post meetings and publish minutes. We did not realize it was required. We are changing the practice immediately." (I guess the
Georgetown School Committee had been violating the
Open Meeting Law for some time!!)
This incident illustrates what probably happens a lot when there is a violation of either the
Open Meeting Law or the
Public Records Law; the public officials just do not understand what the laws require. I think this happens probably because most public officials receive very little training in the two laws and/or because there is little incentive for local officials to obtain more training since the consequences are relatively minor if the laws are violated. (Of course, there are probably some local officials who think they simply do not have to follow the laws, but my guess is those officials are few in number.)
The other thing this incident illustrates is how one person can make a big difference. According to the
Globe North article, the acknowledgement by the school committee's clerk, that the committee was violating the
Open Meetings Law, occurred after Lynn R. Messman, a Georgetown resident, filed a complaint with the office of
Essex County District Attorney Jonathan W. Blodgett. We need more citizens like Ms. Messman.
(I wonder, however, whether Ms. Messman brought the violation to the attention of the
Georgetown School Committee's clerk before she filed the complaint. If she did, and the
School Committee ignored her, then that would be very troubling. A person should not have to file a complaint to get a local official or governing body to comply with either the
Open Meeting Law or the
Public Records Law.)