A continuing series linking to reports and stories about open government issues around Massachusetts. The following are stories about open government issues that appeared during the second half of October:
$165K claim is paid by town(Oct. 17, 2008, Worcester Telegram and Gazette, Aaron Nicodemus)
This story was possible because the T& G made a public records request and obtained a copy of the settlement agreement in a sexual harassment case despite an agreement containing a nondisclosure clause.
Zoning Board Member Adds to Controversy(Oct. 20, 2008, SouthCoastToday.com, Joe Cohen)
After four ZBA members who rejected the Victoria Riverview project with little discussion, New Bedford Economic Development Council President Anthony R. Sapienza formally requested Bristol County District Attorney Sam Sutter conduct an investigation of whether the Massachusetts Open Meeting Law had been violated.
Lawrence School Committee Member(Oct. 20, 2008, The Eagle-Tribune, Mark E. Vogler)
In this story, the Lawrence School Superintendent reportedly told a school committee member that he would no longer receive written answers or copies of public records in response to his written requests for information. Instead, the member will have to schedule a meeting with the School Superintendent to discuss any questions in person.
DA: Selectmen violated Open Meeting Law(Oct. 21, 2008, Milford Daily News, Danielle Ameden)
The Worcester County District Attorney’s office determined that the Milford Board of Selectmen violated the Massachusetts Open Meeting Law when it met with a developer in executive session. The newspaper had filed the complaint with the DA’s office.
Public Records Should Be Public(Oct. 22, 2008, The Boston Globe, Coleman Herman)
Op-ed piece about report the author wrote for Commonwealth Magazine which can be found
here.
A Need for Transperancy Brings Me Back to the Air Waves(Oct. 22, 2008, The Pioneer Institute Blog, Liam Day)
Liam Day of the Pioneer Institute public policy research group weighs writes in favor of openness in government, particularly at the Boston Redevelpment Authority.
Charlton Notebook(Oct. 24, 2008 Worcester Telegram and Gazette, Debbie LaPlaca)
About 50 members of 36 town boards, committees and departments recently attended workshops on the state Open Meeting and Conflict of Interest laws at the town hall.
Party World Space to Become Offices(Oct. 24, 2008, The Republican, Frank Contrada)
Northampton Planning Board receives training in the Open Meeting Law and other topics. The Board receives a discount from its insurer because the training reduces the risk of lawsuits.
James Vittorioso: Sunshine Troublemaker of the Week(Oct. 24, 2008, State Sunshine and Open Records Blog)
More on the Lawrence School Committee situation.
Keeping local government doors open(Oct. 26, 2008, MetroWest Daily News, Editorial)
Editorial about Open Meeting Law violations by the Milford Select Board and the Milford Finance Committee Appointing Committee.
Paving contract nixed in Medway(Oct. 26, 2008, The Milford Daily News, Aaron Wasserman)
Can also be found posted
here. The following quote says it all:
“I think what's important here is what we're all trying to do is gather information to make a decision on what we could do," said Selectman Andrew Espinosa. He added he is "sick and tired of being accused of violating (the) Open Meeting Law because I have conversations to gather information to make the right decision for the town. You know what? I'm going to continue to do that."
A Call for a Public Access Task Force(Oct. 27, 2008, Media Law Blog, Robert J. Ambrogi)
Blog post by the ever vigilant Robert J. Ambrogi, who is a lawyer and the executive director of the Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association. He is on to something, especially as to whether it makes sense to continue to have the public records law and the open meeting law as two separate pieces of legislation with two separate means of enforcement.
Lodge: Patrick locks out the public(Oct. 31, 2008, Metrowest Daily News, Richard K. Lodge)
This is an op-ed piece about the Governor’s meetings behind closed doors with public officials in Salem, New Bedford, Fall River, Quincy, and now Framingham.
Wilkerson fallout: What about the Open Meeting Law? (Oct. 30, 2008, Universal Hub blog, Adam Gaffin)
A blog post pointing out the Open Meeting Law implications of the Dianne Wilkerson scandal. The page also links to an
interesting post by Robert Ambrogi, who points out the irony of Wilkerson’s support for strengthening the Open Meeting Law.
For more stories and commentary, check out the blog at the
New England First Amendment Center, a joint project by the New England First Amendment Coalition and Northeastern University.
Labels: Open Meeting Law, Public Records Law